Reader Forum
Liability Of Gunsmiths I believe "Potential Liability Of The Professional Gunsmith" by Joseph Reichert, Esq. misses the point. Mr. Reichert spends much time discussing the property liability of a gunsmith involved in a shooting incident. This is outside the scope of our profession. As a concealed carry trainer licensed by the California Department of Justice, there is no doubt about the liability of the property owner in this matter, however, it has nothing to do with being a gunsmith.
Our advertisement of our profession indicates competence in the repair and testing of weapons. Let me discuss two type of liability for us. Ordinary Negligence: What I call "just stupid" or knowing that you know nothing about the weapon and have no resources to figure out how to assess its safety. Regardless, should you "repair" the weapon and give it back to the customer after charging for your work and it fails, you get sued. You are liable for this failure.
Intentional Negligence: What I call "knowingly stupid" and ignoring known facts. For example, a collectible 1911 was destroyed in afire. The client took the weapon to a "gunsmith" who pronounced it safe to shoot. Afterward, he brought it to me. I took the weapon apart and found the fire damage and that the gun was assembled with parts missing.
Since this was my first fire-damaged weapon, I read all the literature on fire damage and then checked with my master gunsmith at AGI, who concurred with my findings that the weapon was unsafe and I should advise the client to seal the barrel. I gave my client an opinion letter for his insurance. This "gunsmith" committed Ordinary Negligence telling his client that the gun was safe to shoot; he also failed to assemble the weapon with the correct parts.
The "gunsmith" may have also committed Intentional Negligence because he intentionally ignored the safety standards of the industry and by failing to ask for a second opinion or having supporting evidence by writing that the weapon was safe. Had the client not sealed the weapon and fired it, the gunsmith would have been liable for Ordinary and Intentional Negligence and all the damages from the natural consequences of the injury to the owner and all other persons.
As a retired attorney with 40 years of practice in civil and criminal law, I urge all my colleagues to seek advice from another master gunsmith when the safety of the weapon is in question. That is the scope of our profession and our liability. Overall, the article is good on the issue of general property liability, worker’s comp, and the more specific liability issue of the performance of a gunsmith is related to the issues I’ve addressed.
A shop owner would be faced with the same issues if he were just a home owner in the same situation. Steven J. Ybarra, JD ConsultantsAssociated.com Author Joseph Reichert responds. I respectfully submit that my article does not miss the point because a gunsmith who holds himself out to the public by maintaining a place of business and offering services shoulders a number of legal duties in addition to the duty to exercise sound professional knowledge in the repair and modification of firearms.
Among other things, he has a duty to maintain safe premises to protect his customers from injury. In all jurisdictions with which I’ve had contact, he is obliged to maintain worker’s compensation coverage for his employees. My point in writing the article was to apprise gunsmiths, who may have limited knowledge of the law, of some of the ways in which their business activities can expose them to potential liability.
In this array of perils, incompetence in the repair of firearms is only one type of error which can land them in court. In retrospect, I wish I had added the following statement to my article: "As a gunsmith taking in paid work, you are also a businessman and are subject to the liability and risks to which all businessmen are exposed.
This article is intended to assist your business planning by explaining some of those risks." Nothing I wrote was intended to diminish the role of gunsmithing competence and sound judgment in the repair of firearms. I agree wholeheartedly with your admonition to seek advice when the safety of a weapon is in question. AG
Continue reading
More from the archive
More from this issue
Stocks And Grips
Phase 5 began after Ken Montes built a firearm component in his garage workshop and showed it to a local shopkeeper who asked him to make more for his store. That first component wasn’t built to make money, just to solve a…
Beretta 92
A historic, issue handgun for decades, here’s how to work the Beretta 92.
Maximizing The AR-15
A former military armorer reveals his secrets for cutting AR-15 group sizes in half.
Sako P75
Every now and again, something comes into your shop that just catches your eye. This little Sako was one of those guns. It was in for a deep cleaning and a complete inspection as the owner had inherited this little gem and…
Related workshop reading
Reader Forum
Winchester 94 Issue I have a late Winchester Model 94 End of Trail chambered in 357 Magnum that has feeding issues. The link is apparently worn and will not always prevent cartridges in the magazine tube from dumping under the carrier, locking…
Reader Forum
Weatherby Orion I have a Weatherby Orion (Japanese version) in my shop and have searched for complete disassembly instructions in this over/under shotgun but have very little information on it. The owner has said that the shotgun unlocks after about twenty shots…
Reader Forum
The 4473 is automatically updated and all background information can be viewed directly in the dealer’s LEEP account. formation, schedule a demo with Bryan at or Stevens Problems and Screws I have a second old project gun which has a difficult to…
Reader Forum
Diamond Shotgun I have a Diamond shotgun in my shop and need some internal parts for. Can you please help me identify it by the pictures? I have looked through all the old publications I have and all the reference books. Either…
MFGAxis Discussion